New Haven will likely pay thousands for tent compound cleanup in West Haven
The effort to clean up the remnants of a tent compound strewn with hazardous material, human excrement and burned vegetation will likely cost New Haven thousands of dollars.
There had initially been some confusion about which city — New Haven or West Haven — was responsible for cleaning up the debris, which is in West Haven but is a part of New Haven’s West River Memorial Park. New Haven has taken charge of the cleanup, which is ongoing, city spokeswoman Jessica Mayorga said.
The “tent city,” which had occupied the wooded area off Marginal Drive for several years, was reportedly plagued by drug use and violence and littered with garbage. Last month, people were removed from the compound, and the tents were taken down, because of public health and safety concerns, West Haven Police Officer Bret Schneider said. Some of the people were taken to Columbus House, a shelter for the homeless in New Haven; others refused services.
Maureen Lillis, acting health director for West Haven, confirmed her department solicited bids for the cleanup, one of which was for $17,000. New Haven would have reimbursed West Haven for the cost, Lillis said. Lillis said she is “pleased” with what has been done, but deferred further comment to New Haven.
Mayorga said only that the Department of Parks, Recreation and Trees is expected to have the job completed by the end of this week. She said she did not yet have the costs for the project.
Schneider has said the removal of the compound would permit New Haven to restore a once-vibrant area; he said Community Resource Officers continually patrol the area to make sure no one is living there.
At the time it was cleared, at least one advocate for homeless people said he was concerned about where the people who lived in the compound would go, since many are not equipped to live in a shelter setting. Schneider said the Police Department has had no issues with the people who had been living in the compound since it was cleared.
In June, residents of the compound, at least one of whom had a subsidized apartment, told a Register columnist they considered themselves a family, and called their site “Land of the Free, Home of the Brave.”
In August, a West Haven Planning and Zoning official evaluated the environmental impact of the “tent city” and New Haven officials assessed cleanup needs.
Lillis said once the cleanup has been completed, West Haven officials will make sure that everything is “done the way it should be from a health perspective.” Continued...
Call Amanda Pinto at 203-789-5734.
Reader Comments
The following are comments from the readers. All comments are reviewed by our editors before posting. Posts that violate our Online Comment Policy will not be posted. If you believe your post was wrongly removed, not approved or would like further explanation of discussion board terms email comments@nhregister.com. In no way do the comments represent the view of nhregister.com.
Frank wrote on Sep 6, 2010 3:05 AM:
Bill Jarett wrote on Sep 6, 2010 3:41 AM:
Leave it alone wrote on Sep 6, 2010 6:09 AM:
pres obama wrote on Sep 6, 2010 7:10 AM:
Barrack O wrote on Sep 6, 2010 8:17 AM:
I am dedicated to the idea that all Americans deserve the home of their choice, be it a tent, a condo or an underwater mcmansion. My administration has proposed many programs aimed at mortgage holders, but, now it's time to expand our outreach.
More Americans than ever have decided to leave the confines of a "traditional" wood or concrete home and enjoy the simpler lifestyle of tent encampment living. These hardy, frugal folks arrive at this choice in many ways. For some, it's an economic choice. For others, it's a love of the great outdoors and a spirit of adventure. For most, it's a mixture of these.
My administration will fight for every citizen's right to live in a tent encampment with others who share their values and ideals. We will use every means at our disposal to not only keep these encampments open but also to increase the number of Americans living in these groups.
Some have suggested calling these encampments "Obamavilles". While I am reluctant to take credit for the growth in these tent communities, I say if the American people insist on naming them "Obamavilles", so be it.
I'll soon be introducing my "Tent Encampment Normalization and Tennant act". Please contact your Representative in Congress and ask them to join us in protecting the rights of all Americans to live in tents, where ever and with whom ever they choose. "
to really wrote on Sep 6, 2010 8:21 AM:
Dave wrote on Sep 6, 2010 8:22 AM:
Ant wrote on Sep 6, 2010 8:32 AM:
Bite Me wrote on Sep 6, 2010 8:42 AM:
Bob wrote on Sep 6, 2010 9:06 AM:
DEM. wrote on Sep 6, 2010 9:21 AM:
me2 wrote on Sep 6, 2010 9:31 AM:
JFTB wrote on Sep 6, 2010 9:32 AM:
Did you miss the line that at least one of the tent city residents has a subsidized apartment? I believe the reality is that these folks are impaired either through mental health, drugs, or people with mental health concerns self medicating with drugs.
The whole mental health population suffers when we assert rights to them. If they are impaired in judgment, why do we allow them to endanger themselves by living in tents? I'm all for advocating for disadvantaged populations, but I think in this case advocacy should be to treat people with mental illnesses until they are well. I think if you spoke with some of these folks, you'd find they are there because of their paranoia. "
Slant 6 wrote on Sep 6, 2010 10:16 AM:
me2 wrote on Sep 6, 2010 10:20 AM:
cba wrote on Sep 6, 2010 10:20 AM:
Ken wrote on Sep 6, 2010 10:24 AM:
Hooverville wrote on Sep 6, 2010 10:26 AM:
You teabaggers are always the first to scream at full volume about any kind of social services spending as a waste of tax dollars. Now you want to complain about this problem when it lands in a public park. @ Frank said something about a "free trip out of state". Frank would be the first person screaming about that "free trip" because it would be paid for with tax dollars. He would also be screaming about people from other states who got a "free trip" here. Shifting the homeless and mentally ill to another jurisdiction doesn't make them any less homeless or sick. But at least they aren't in your back yard, eh Frank?
I had a brother who was schizophrenic. He heard voices and had other hallucinations. From the time he was diagnosed at age 19 until he died at age 35 he was unable to care for himself. This was not a moral failing. This was not personal laziness. This was a brain disease that rendered the victim incapable of holding a job or taking care of himself.
Would you expect a polio victim to work loading bags of cement on a dock? This illness is not taken seriously by most people because there are no obvious physical symptoms like missing limbs. What social services exist are limited. My family is not rich, but we were fortunate enough to be able to advocate for my brother. He would be in the emergency room hearing voices, believing that bad people were stealing his thoughts. We filled out the paperwork because he couldn't. We constantly fought to get him the care he needed, care we couldn't afford personally because we are not wealthy.
What about somebody in his condition who had no family capable of fighting for him? They end up living in a squalid camp in a public park with nobody caring whether or not they live or die. The cops didn't do anything because there isn't anything they could do. Dump them in the ER? They will be back on the street in 30 days or less. So they ignore it as long as nobody is getting knifed.
I am sick of the petty selfishness of those who complain about the problem, yet are unwilling to do anything to solve it. You don't want to allocate enough resources to take care of these folks, then scream about it when it lands in your back yard. You can't just ship these people over state lines and pretend that they magically disappear. "
arizona sheriff wrote on Sep 6, 2010 11:15 AM:
to really wrote on Sep 6, 2010 11:23 AM:
facts be known i doubt any teabaggers live there. But i am sure a lot of these people that live there would vote for obama if they did vote!! "
tpod wrote on Sep 6, 2010 11:52 AM:
This will be everyday living wrote on Sep 6, 2010 12:06 PM:
The USA is in trouble.WATCH "
third world nation wrote on Sep 6, 2010 12:55 PM:
Lin wrote on Sep 6, 2010 1:28 PM:
the grapes of wrath wrote on Sep 6, 2010 1:52 PM:
Hooverville to tea party wrote on Sep 6, 2010 2:16 PM:
Unless you are wealthy there is absolutely no way you can afford to handle a problem like this on your own. Insurance companies refuse to cover preexisting conditions. If you can't hold a job because you are a raving lunatic you arent going to be able to AFFORD insurance to begin with. Not only that even the best insurance policies out there either don't cover mental health services or terminate them after a short time.
You would not think of blaming a victim of a traffic accident for being paralyzed, yet you do so with these folks. Do you expect 5 year-olds to get jobs and pay for their upkeep? Obama is no more to blame for insane folks running wild in the streets than Bush. But he certainly seems a lot more willing to do something about the problem than leave them to fend for themselves.
It is funny how most of the political crowd seems so eager to turn every human tragedy into a political issue. It doesn't seem to matter if you are a lefty or a righty. Whatever happened to common decency? If you think taking care of the sick and injured is some sort of theft, good luck explaining that to Saint Peter or whoever you believe you will be judged by when you die. Bring a stick and a bag of marshmallows, you sound like you will need it. "
CT citizen wrote on Sep 6, 2010 2:18 PM:
Sorry Glenn Beck wrote on Sep 6, 2010 2:33 PM:
sign
I need a drink/drug "
Lower Taxes wrote on Sep 6, 2010 2:43 PM:
nfd wrote on Sep 6, 2010 3:48 PM:
OBAMAVILLE wrote on Sep 6, 2010 4:42 PM:
I remember wrote on Sep 6, 2010 5:50 PM:
WEST HAVEN POLICE DEPT wrote on Sep 6, 2010 6:01 PM:
Fecal Obstruction wrote on Sep 6, 2010 6:26 PM:
me wrote on Sep 6, 2010 6:56 PM:
Dismayed wrote on Sep 6, 2010 7:27 PM:
Anon wrote on Sep 6, 2010 8:02 PM:
... at alleged industry standards of $5000 each.
Plus the 5 gallon bucket chairs, $100 a piece! Do I hear $200?! "
Submit a Comment
We encourage your feedback and dialogue. All comments are moderated by the editors. We ask you to follow a few simple guidelines when commenting on stories on nhregister.com.
1) Please post responsibly.
2) Be polite.
3) Don't hate.
4) If you object to someone's post, use the "Report Abuse" button and we'll review it.
5) Users who don't play by the rules will be blocked and won't be allowed to participate.
6) Self-promotion of businesses or advertisements of anything for sale are not permitted.
By posting here you agree to abide by our terms and conditions and privacy policy which can be viewed by clicking here.
See inaccurate information in a story? Other feedback and/or ideas for us to consider? Tell us here.
What should we investigate? Have a tip you want us to look into? Tell us here.
Talk of the Web
National News Videos
Recent Activity on Facebook
Blog Center
New Haven Homicide Report
A community focused project that provides continuing coverage of every murder victim and homicide case in New Haven, from the crime to the courts.
New Haven Register Photo Blog
A focused look at our photography, technology & technique from the New Haven Register multimedia staff.
Hamden-North Haven Times
Check out Assistant Metro Editor Ann DeMatteo's timely blog about all things Hamden and North Haven.
RSS







